TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Bulleted text From:Tracy Boyington <tracy_boyington -at- OKVOTECH -dot- ORG> Date:Mon, 22 Jun 1998 15:15:42 -0500
> This thread has been going on for so long that I'm beginning
> to question my understanding of indenting bullets.
Me too, and I've already had one off-line conversation about it. :-) But
I don't see the difference in your examples. To me, aligned bullets look
like this:
--------------
This is pargraph one, which is the main paragraph, and
the bullets will have something to do with this paragraph.
* Bullet 1 blah blah blah
* Bullet 2 blah blah blah
- And if you have a second-level bullet it would go here
- And here, of course
* Bullet 3 blah blah blah
---------
And indented bullets look like this:
---------
This is pargraph one, which is the main paragraph, and
the bullets will have something to do with this paragraph.
* Bullet 1 blah blah blah
* Bullet 2 blah blah blah
- And if you have a second-level bullet it would go here
- And here, of course
* Bullet 3 blah blah blah
---------
To me, the second arrangement makes it unclear which bullets fall under
which text. Perhaps it's because the aligned bullet is similar to the
way I learned to outline:
I. Big topic
A. Subtopic 1
1. Sub-subtopic 1
2. Sub-subtopic 2
in which every letter or number is aligned directly under the text it
breaks out from (and I woulda been in trouble if I'd done it any other
way). Old habits die hard, don't they?