TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Salary Survey from STC From:"Taylor, Steve" <steve -dot- taylor -at- ALLEGIANCETELECOM -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 10 Jun 1998 14:36:13 -0500
I stand corrected. Please see Barry's computations below. I was just using
the averages, and forgot to figure in a few extras..If an hourly employee is
making $20 (which average about 2008 hours per year), then a contractor most
certainly would make $41 (which is the average for Dallas)...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Campbell [SMTP:barry -at- WEBVERANDA -dot- COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 1998 2:25 PM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: Salary Survey from STC
>
> At 01:10 PM 6/10/98 -0500, Steve Taylor wrote:
>
> >Chart 3 indicates an average national contracting rate of 48.50. The
> average
> >person works 2008 hours a year. That is $97,388. If that's low, I am
> doing
> >something wrong.
>
> No offense, Steve, but you're doing something wrong: there's more
> information that needs to be factored in.
>
> First, you're assuming that every hour worked is billable. Figure 18
> indicates that survey respondents work roughly forty hour weeks (okay,
> 38.8), but not all of that time is billable. Figure 19 shows that, on
> average, 80% of time worked by survey respondents is billable.
>
> Let's run the new numbers:
>
> 38.8 hours/week * 52 weeks (assuming *no* vacation time or down time--
> highly questionable assumptions in my opinion, but let's let that ride
> for the moment) = 2018 hours worked in a calendar year.
>
> Now, let's estimate how many of those hours are actually billable:
>
> 2018 hours/year * average billing rate of 80% (.8) = 1614 billable hours
> per calendar year (it's not altogether clear whether vacation time or
> down time were factored into this "billable percentage".)
>
> So. Already we're down to 1618 * 48.50) = estimated annual gross of
> $78,473
> (and, again, this may well assume *no* vacation time and *no* down time,
> since there are many tasks which must be performed in the course of doing
> business that cannot be ethically billed to a client.)
>
> Presto! Almost $20,000 gross per annum disappears through the magic of
> statistical interpretation. :-)
>
> If you're a 1099 employee, you do your own withholding and SocSec, which
> must be escrowed against your quarterly tax payments... and after you
> pay Uncle Sugar there are *many* other overhead expenses to be factored
> in: insurance, training, equipment, investing for retirement, and so
> forth.
>
> All in all, a good contractor who stays busy and billable *can* make
> more money than a person in a staff job, but it's by no means a given.
> The extra money can be thought of either as a risk premium or as a
> reward for doing your own marketing and management--in reality, it's
> a combination of the two.
>
> I do know many technical writers, both staffers and consultants, whose
> gross 100K a year or better, by the way.
>
> On the other hand, I live in New York City, where you can qualify for
> subsidized housing, under certain circumstances, with an income of up
> to $135K a year. Average rent for a one-bedroom apartment in my
> neighborhood is $1,500; if you have an actual family with kids and dogs
> and so forth, you're looking at between two and three thousand a month
> in rent for a habitable place.
>
> Everything is relative.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Barry Campbell
> Barry Campbell * barry -at- webveranda -dot- com * 40.77 N, 73.97 W
> --
> [O]ne of the strongest motives that leads men to art
> and science is escape from everyday life with its
> painful crudity and hopeless dreariness...
> -- Albert Einstein, "Principles of Research" (1918)
>
> ~
>