TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Graphics vs. Schematics From:Tom Johnson <johnsont -at- FREEWAY -dot- NET> Date:Mon, 9 Feb 1998 12:16:36 -0500
Christine Lienhart wrote:
<Introductory material snipped>
> So, do you think it would it be wise to switch to photos? Would it help
> to have a schematic alongside the photo? Is it better to have only
> photos or only schematics to avoid confusion? Which is more comfortable
> for the user?
>
> I'd appreciate any input!
>
> Christine
>
>
Christine,
Have you considered line art? A schematic is highly conceptual. A
photograph has a lot of extraneous information. With a line drawing you
can add callouts and include just enough detail so the reader recognizes
necessary landmarks to plug cables in the right places. In short, a line
drawing can add a lot of clarity that is missing in either a schematic
or a photograph. It may take a little longer, but it is usually worth
the effort. And, let me add, it can be a lot of fun.
--
Tom Johnson
Technical Writer
