TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: [Long] Making Money in Technical Writing & Roger Peterson
Subject:Re: [Long] Making Money in Technical Writing & Roger Peterson From:Sella Rush <SellaR -at- APPTECHSYS -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 30 Jan 1998 13:42:06 -0800
Re advertising: I thought that Kent's post was ok in light of the fact
that he was referring to a survey (or whatever) that started on this
list and that the word "plagarism" was used.
Making a comment like "might be plagarism because titles and content
seemed similar" is about as bad as the news stories we've been enduring
for the past few weeks. I can't think of any slur that would be worse
for a writer.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sella Rush mailto:sellar -at- apptechsys -dot- com
Applied Technical Systems, Inc. (ATS)
Bremerton, Washington USA
Developers of the CCM Database
> ----------
> From: Bob Morrisette[SMTP:writer1 -at- SABU -dot- ENG -dot- SUN -dot- COM]
> Reply To: Bob Morrisette
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 1998 12:18 PM
> To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
> Subject: Re: [Long] Making Money in Technical Writing & Roger
> Peterson
>
> I thought advertising was not allowed on this list.
>
> Bob Morrisette
>
