TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Info Overload From:"Jessica N. Lange" <jlange -at- OHIOEE -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 29 Jan 1998 12:39:59 -0500
Hello, Sue
I had same problem. Plus, there are threads I'm not interested in, and the
digest makes it harder to skip. My solution: 1. stop using digest, and 2.
use Outlook Express (comes free with IE4).
Reasons to use Outlook Express (or other sophisticated email utility):
1. filters - every post from TechWr-L goes into its own folder. (also
the winhlp-L posts, and others)
2. ability to group by subject, so posts on same thread are easy to
identify and read/not read.
3. preview pane. Although I don't use it, others may. Being able to read
the first few lines of a post lets you know pretty quickly whether you want
to read the rest of it or not.
4. folder organization. Posts I want to keep get dragged into various
other folders, for example, I save every *solution* for HTML Help that I
find: it's faster than searching the web Archive.
HTH
Jessica N. Lange
Technical Communicator
Ohio Electronic Engravers, Inc. mailto:jlange -at- ohioee -dot- com
Sue Krol wrote:
>I get the "digest" version of this subscriber list--because I previously
>missed more important e-mail that seemed to get buried in the tons of
>individual mail from this list--<italic>but the digest is so huge it's
>hard to...uh...digest!</italic> Scrolling through these huge mailings to
>find subjects listed on page one is pretty inefficient. Printing the
>digest wastes way too much paper. Having digest subjects linked to the
>topics could help someday, but does anyone have any suggestions for
>handling this enormous amount of often-useful info until a better way of
>presenting it evolves?
>