TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Writing samples: what to look for From:Elizabeth Vollbach <vollbach -at- PACBELL -dot- NET> Date:Wed, 21 Jan 1998 17:14:09 -0800
On 21 Jan 1998 10:55:42 -0600, Barry House <bhouse -at- creative-house -dot- com> wrote:
>This is fascinating, especially since I've NEVER put together a true
>portfolio--meaning a big black book with writing samples artfully arranged
>in a pretty package. I've usually grabbed 3-5 pieces that relate to the
>work being discussed and thrown them in a file folder. During the interview
>I talk the person through each piece--who the audience was, whether I
>worked alone or on a team, etc.
>
>How many of you TWs who interview really expect a portfolio? Why? If I've
>written a 150-page how-to booklet, how do I fit that into a portfolio? Can
>the strength of the writing overcome the lack of proper presentation?
Every time this topic is discussed I feel bad, like I do it wrong. Yet I
continue to do it the way I do it, the way you do. I bring copies of
documents that are applicable to the job I'm interviewing for. Nothing
fancy. Frankly, the reason I do it this way is because I just can't carry a
portfolio showing samples of all the different types of documents I've
written/edited. It would simply be too heavy, and I'd probably fall on my
face as I came through the door.
I do what's practical for me, and in 14 years an interviewer hasn't even
hinted dissatisfaction. From what I've seen, interviewers have been more
concerned with my record of experience and my references.