Re: HELP - Bad contract wording?

Subject: Re: HELP - Bad contract wording?
From: JIMCHEVAL -at- AOL -dot- COM
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 1997 11:44:04 -0400

In a message dated 97-09-08 10:54:37 EDT, bosscomm -at- interlog -dot- com writes:

<< His response was "Oh, just cross it out. It's always been in our
standard contract so we leave it in although we know it isn't
enforceable any more anyway." >>
"But of course some people don't know that, so they just go ahead and sign,
and then everytime they want to deal with another agency, they have to let us
know about it and we get all this competitive intelligence, plus it
discourages them from going elsewhere anyway, so we got all these benefits
without any of the legal hassles.

Neat, huh?"

The swine.

Jim C.
=======================================================
Visit Chez Jim: Jim Chevallier's Home Page - http://www.gis.net/~jimcheval
=======================================================

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: HELP - Bad contract wording?
Next by Author: Sample Macros (Word 6 -> Word 97) - processing multiple files
Previous by Thread: HELP - Bad contract wording?
Next by Thread: Re: HELP - Bad contract wording?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads