Re: Certification Redux

Subject: Re: Certification Redux
From: Chris Hamilton <chamilton -at- GR -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 12:22:33 -0500

So, Bill--

It's it your contention then that outside the determination of a
certification board, there is no valid or relevant determination of
quality in technical communication or technical communicators?

Chris



Bill DuBay wrote:
>
> Arlen,
> Aren't objective standards important here? It is quite possible that your
> work stinks, yet you and your employer both think it is grand. Getting some
> way of more objectively identifying and evaluating skills is why every
> professional organization has certification. Even us.
>
> Bill DuBay

--
Chris Hamilton, Technical Writer
Greenbrier & Russel
847.330.4146
chamilton -at- gr -dot- com

"Please do not try to confuse the issues with facts!"
-- George Banks, "Mary Poppins"

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Another certification survey--would you do it?
Next by Author: Re: Making myself marketable
Previous by Thread: Re: Certification Redux
Next by Thread: Re[2]: Certification Redux


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads