Re: Certification Redux

Subject: Re: Certification Redux
From: Eric Haddock <ehaddock -at- ENGAGENET -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 16:57:10 -0500

Bill DuBay writes:
>> I would like to apply for a job with all the armaments possible, my
portfolio, my resume, my good looks, my powers of persuasion. But especially
important would be a certificate from my professional peers testifying that I
have the skills they consider essential. That would be very satisfying to me.
<<

That's it? So you can have a warm fuzzy? Your portfolio isn't enough, your
resume isn't enough, your "powers of persuasion" (whatever n'hell that means)
aren't enough--so you need to have certification on top of all of that? Why
wouldn't all those other things be enough? What's wrong?


> certificate from my professional peers

Ooh--something I hadn't though of: who certifies the certifiers?



Regards from beautiful Wisconsin! :)

Me --> http://www2.pitnet.net/moonlion mailto:moonlion -at- full-moon -dot- com
Work --> http://www.engagenet.com mailto:ehaddock -at- engagenet -dot- com

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Certification Issues
Next by Author: Re: Education and Productivity: Whats the Correlation?
Previous by Thread: Re: Certification Redux
Next by Thread: Re: Certification Redux


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads