TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:ISO Standard for Warnings? From:"THOMAS A. JOHNSON" <am312 -at- TRAVERSE -dot- LIB -dot- MI -dot- US> Date:Wed, 16 Apr 1997 14:47:38 -0400
Is anyone aware of any standards (ISO or otherwise) regarding warning
terminology? Specifically, I'm wondering about using two different words
to designate whether an action will damage a machine (economic loss) or
whether it will injure or kill someone. The words that come to mind are
warning, caution, danger, note, important. How are these words related to
increasing severity of conditions?
Once I get that figured out, are there corresponding icons that I can use
in our manuals so readers can quickly identify which warnings pertain to
personal safety?
Thanks for your help.
Tom Johnson
am312 -at- traverse -dot- lib -dot- mi -dot- us
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
