Re: e-prime info

Subject: Re: e-prime info
From: Stephen Victor <svictor -at- HOUSTON -dot- GEOQUEST -dot- SLB -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 10:06:46 -0600

Miki Magyar wrote:
> Jane Bergen said:
> One of my pet peeves involves the use of the verb "to be" -- most of the
> time the writing is more authoritative and has more impact if we eliminate
> that verb.
> I heartily agree! The subject is General Semantics, and the web site for
> the International Society for General Semantics (ISGS) is
> Clarity and precision in thought and language is desirable in both technical
> and 'creative' writing. My perception is that practice in one domain carries
> over into the other. To stimulate the 'leetle grey cells', see also deBono's
> books on lateral thinking.
> Regards,
> Miki
> mikim -at- mcdata -dot- com
> "Curtsy while you're thinking what to say. It saves time"
> Lewis Carroll

Ah, but in the quotations given above, I count no fewer than five
instances of the verb "to be" (six counting the Carroll quotation). If
we intend to advocate the use of E-prime, let's at least practice what
we preach. ;)

Stephen P. Victor Phone: (713) 513-2552
Technical Writer, Software Training Fax: (713) 513-2019
Schlumberger GeoQuest svictor -at- houston -dot- geoquest -dot- slb -dot- com
5599 San Felipe, Suite 1700
Houston, Texas 77056 USA

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Re: Eng. v. Mktg.
Next by Author: Re: Hiring Practices
Previous by Thread: Printing an incomplete manual
Next by Thread: Desktop Publishing Advice

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads