Re: tests

Subject: Re: tests
From: Peggy Schillinger <peggys -at- STLNET -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 16:58:31 -0600

Camille Krug wrote:

> I agree with Roger, Lisa et al that anyone worth their salt won't be
> offended by having to take a test: it's just good business. It is truly an
> objective means of gauging skills at various levels.

I have read the messages about skills tests for tech writer applicants
with interest because I once got in a lot of trouble for trying this.

I found a writing test in a professional magazine that would have taken
about 30 minutes for a skilled candidate. It covered some grammar
correction, some awkward sentence rewrites, some conceptual issues, etc.
There wasn't anything tested that would have offended anybody--except my
company's HR department, which threw a giant fit.

It seems that there is a large body of law devoted to the issue of bias
and exclusionary skills testing. The HR group demanded absolute control
over any tests administered by the company, even including typing and
transcribing tests used for clerical applicants. Companies that test
applicants and then try to use the results to affect the hiring decision
are asking for lawsuits and evidently are vulnerable to discrimination

The EEOC has strong guidelines for applicant tests.

Regards....Peggy Schillinger

Previous by Author: Re: Agency and interviewing questions
Next by Author: Re: Word Format Overrides
Previous by Thread: tests
Next by Thread: Re: tests

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads