TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Correct Wording - a.n. (ad nauseum) From:mmarkley -at- MICRON -dot- COM Date:Tue, 26 Nov 1996 11:04:11 MST
I would like to get my two cents in (i.e., my opinion). Everyone on
this list (i.e., the TECHWR-L list) has differing opinions regarding
abreviations (e.g., e.g.,i.e.,AD, etc.); i.e., some people seem to
favor using them, while others feel that they are a distracting
(i.e., removing the readers' attention from the content). However,
I think most people would agree that, depending on your audience
(i.e., the people who read your writing), using these abreviations is
often acceptable; e.g., in medical journals, in academic journals, and
on technical writer mail lists. Because the use of these abreviations
(i.e., e.g., i.e., AD, etc.) is often abused, I think it's important to
advocate moderation when using them; i.e., use abbreviations with the
understanding that you may be alienating some of your readers (which is
what I have most likely done here).