TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Salaries in the US From:Eric Haddock <eric -at- ENGAGENET -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 2 Oct 1996 10:01:45 -0500
>The rates were much higher on both US
>coasts. The same is happening now.
and from another post:
>The highest median
>salary in the Ca area (according to the survey) is $54,600.
I guess I'm missing something here.
Of course the salary for people living on the coasts verses inland are
going to be very different. The cost of living is substantially more on the
coasts than it is here in the middle. Just because your paycheck has a
higher dollar amount than a midwester does not at all translate into better
living.
According to a calcultor I found on a web page, if I make $45,000 here in
Milwaukee but decided to move to San Diego, I would have to ask for
$55,990--anything less and I would be taking a pay cut despite the almost
$11,000 increase in pay.
Moving to D.C. is cheaper--I'd only have to ask for $50,368.
If I made the STC median of $54,600 in San Diego, I'd only have to ask
for around $43,000 in Milwaukee.
With this in mind, it doesn't make any difference what they're paying in
California verses your salary in Ohio, Wisconsin, etc. What really matters
is what you can do with that money.
I guess if you _really_ want to cash in, get those big ol' salaries on
the coast then move inward at the same pay amount. You'd be living large, to
be sure.