TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I am looking for ideas/suggestions on getting useful and thorough reviews of
documents from developers and engineers. Our review process could stand some
improvement, but the reviewers don't take it seriously or seem to understand the
importance of it. Currently, they are each given a copy of the document and told
to mark their comments. No group meetings take place to discuss reviews, and the
reviewers do not schedule their time to include this process. I have been
looking for information regarding this without much luck and would appreciate
any suggestions or sources you all might have.
Thanks for your help,
Karen Serenil
Ft. Worth, TX
kserenil -at- teknekron -dot- com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net
