TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Commas (was: But for however) From:Tommy Trussell <twt -at- CEI -dot- NET> Date:Mon, 13 Nov 1995 16:26:01 -0600
>They don't mention commas signifying breaths. I have heard this before but
>I think it's one of those old 'rules' of writing that started as someone's
>pet theory and somehow became a law. I might use it as a handy rule-of-thumb
>or analogy for someone who wasn't a confident writer -- "Think of it like a
>pause for breath in the middle of a sentence".
I agree that using breaths to place commas could easily mislead someone.
Just, imagine, an, instruc-, tion card, for a, person, with, severe,
emphy-, sema.
