TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:WWW discussion (long vs short) From:Betsy Maaks <bmaaks -at- FRAME -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 27 Oct 1995 08:54:36 CDT
<snip header stuff>
>2. Use easily readable texts, especially adapted for WWW in a restricted
>length.
Wineke,
I second Mark Levinson and Simon North. Consider both reader's time and
download time. It is well documented that it is difficult to transfer paper
to online with NO adaptation, and whoever thinks this is effective
communication is (a) not a technical writer, and/or (b) not a subscriber to
this listserver.
I recommend the book "Teach Yourself Web Publishing with HTML in a Week" by
Laura Lemay (SAMS Publishing, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 1995). I also
suggest browsing through some of the web sites yourself, to see what you
like, what is easy to locate, visually appealing, etc. Find some competitors
on the Web; they market to the same audience.
Let me know if you have difficulty finding Lemay's book in the Netherlands.
Betsy Maaks
The opinions here are my own, not my employer's (who today is Adobe,
tomorrow...?)
****************************************************************
Betsy Maaks + Adobe Systems
312-266-3208 + (formerly Frame Technology)
bmaaks -at- frame -dot- com + 441 W. Huron Street
+ Chicago, IL 60610