Re: Numbering

Subject: Re: Numbering
From: Beverly Parks <bparks -at- HUACHUCA-EMH1 -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 08:28:35 MST

John Posada <jposada -at- NOTES -dot- CC -dot- BELLCORE -dot- COM> asked about
numbering-->

We write technical proposals for the communications industry
in response to bid and proposal solicitations ansd some of
them are quite technical. For the most part, we use
government numbering:

1.0, 2.0, 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.2, etc.

Now, the question.

Would I have been able to put a 2.1 if I hadn't used a 2.2?
If not, how do I do a 2.1.1 and a 2.1.2 if I hadn't used a 2.2

=============
Could the content of 2.1 be incorporated into 2.0, and what
would have been 2.1.1, 2.1.2, etc could become 2.1, 2.2, etc.

A general rule as I understand it is that if there is only a
single subparagraph, that information can probably be included
in the higher level paragraph immediately above it.

Just a thought.
___________________________________________________________

"The Web is the most exciting thing happening in computers
today... . Also, it's very exciting because Microsoft
doesn't own it." -- Steve Jobs, founder of Apple Computer

=*= Beverly Parks -- bparks -at- huachuca-emh1 -dot- army -dot- mil =*=
=*= "Unless otherwise stated, all comments are my own. =*=
=*= I am not representing my employer in any way." =*=


Previous by Author: Re: Findlay...once again
Next by Author: Re: Numbering
Previous by Thread: Numbering
Next by Thread: Re: Numbering


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads