Re. Paper sizes

Subject: Re. Paper sizes
From: Geoff Hart <geoff-h -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 09:02:55 LCL

Kathleen Alt (welcome to the list!) asked a few questions about paper
size:

1. There isn't any formal "standard" for computer books. The main
standards arise from the paper industry's standard paper sizes, which
are multiples of 8.5X11 inches in North America. (Europe, Oz and Japan
use somewhat different standards.) There's a really good economic
reason to adhere to these sizes: anything with a different size will
require the printer to trim the paper to its final size. This wastes
paper, thus money. A good non-economic reason is that you may want
your book to fit tidily on the shelf beside other computer books, in
which case, the task is to find out what books most of your audience
uses.

2. You should also talk to your printer. Everyone seems to have a
different press, and thus a different maximum paper size. The most
economical solution is generally to use the largest piece of paper
your printer's press can handle and then fold this and trim it to
final size. (Rationale: press time is the most expensive part of
printing for any job that doesn't use four-color printing, thus, the
fewer passes through the press, the cheaper the job.)

3. Always define your page size within the software that will do the
final printing so that this information travels with the text and
graphics. You often can't do otherwise anyway; for example, what
stationary store provides reams of 5X7 inch laser printer paper?
Another advantage: defining the page size and margins within the
software lets you generate crop marks (either automatically, in DTP
software, or by hand, in wordpro software); these help printers line
up camera-ready copy in front of the camera and trim it to final size.

Hope this helps. Feel free to drop me a line directly if you need more
details.

--Geoff Hart @8^{)}
geoff-h -at- mtl -dot- feric -dot- ca

Disclaimer: If I didn't commit it in print in one of
our reports, it don't represent FERIC's opinion.


Previous by Author: Re. Juice instructins
Next by Author: Re. Multimedia writers
Previous by Thread: Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 11 Aug 1995 to 12 Aug 1995
Next by Thread: Re. Multimedia writers


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads