Frame vs. Pagemaker (Pet peeve #3148)

Subject: Frame vs. Pagemaker (Pet peeve #3148)
From: Stuart Reynolds <stuartr -at- FIRSTGRAPHICS -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 1995 05:27:13 -0800

-- [ From: Stuart Reynolds * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] --

> How does PageMaker accomplish the tasks of Cross Referencees, pagination,
book
> and TOC generation, anchored frames, etc.? Frankly, If I thought PageMaker
> could accomplish any of those tasks, I'd dump FrameMaker. And I suspect
Adobe
> wouldn't have gone through all the trouble to buy something they already
had.

> I still maintain that full mastery is required when the docs group is
working
> together on a project.

> As I said, the ability to write is a given. I would not consider a person
for a
> TW job if they couldn't write. FrameMaker is a requirement.


Very easily if you know what you are doing with it. I have been using PM
for what seems like forever. I have done a few 300+ page manuals / guides
with it, no problems. I can even send you a cipy of the last one I did if
you like. I think you'll find that it all comes down to as you said,
mastery of the application. I've never even touched frame. So I wouldn't
know where to start. But you would be the one losing out, if I applied with
you and you turned me down, not because I wasn't qulified enough, but just
because I didn't use your personal choice in software.


--
Goin' down in flames... But the colours are neat!!
======------+++++------======
First Impression Graphics

Hard, Soft and GUI.. We've gotcha covered.

stuartr -at- firstgraphics -dot- com


Previous by Author: Re: question about term ("wild card"/"wildcard")
Next by Author: Re: the pound sign (#)
Previous by Thread: Re: It is . . (and there are)
Next by Thread: TW Job in Cincinnati, Ohio


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads