TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Testing From:Herman Holtz <holtz -at- CLARK -dot- NET> Date:Tue, 14 Mar 1995 09:52:11 -0500
On Tue, 14 Mar 1995, Deborah Kluge wrote:
> Most authors of books and articles that I have read on this subject say that
> reading help wanted ads is one of the least efffective methods of
> conducting a job search. The "hidden job market," touted by these
> "experts" and uncovered via dogged networking is supposedly the best
> method and is where the "real" jobs are.
> IMHO, this is a lot of hogwash. Because this idea had been burned into my
> brain for so long, I used to feel guilty about reading the want ads, knowing
> that this was not something I was "supposed" to do. But, I have found
> quite a few good (freelance) jobs this way and have had callbacks and offers
> on others that I could not take or was not interested in doing. I know
> others in my field who have met with similar success by responding to help
> wanted ads.
I have to support this. In a fairly long career of working--since age
17--and much of that in fields where turnover/job-switching is typical, I
have found jobs by all methods, but more than a few by reading want ads.
In fact, one such beginning led directly to a top-slot management job.
