TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I've found that engineers are very responsive if they think that someone
is watching, so what I do is put questions, with their name attached, right
into the text of the review draft, marked with a pointing hand, rev bars,
and a bold-italic font. The review copy is prefaced by a table of contents
of the questions, each of which has someone's name attached.
The first thing the reviewer sees is his name on a bunch of questions,
and he KNOWS that everyone else knows that he's supposed to answer them.
Very few engineers can withstand this putative peer pressure, especially
when a simple list is something that even engineering managers can deal
with, when asked to take corrective action.
