TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Job Futures for Tech Writing From:Romay Jean Sitze <rositze -at- NMSU -dot- EDU> Date:Fri, 2 Dec 1994 11:28:34 -0700
On Thu, 1 Dec 1994, Gwen Gall wrote:
> I have seen (and had to fix) too many manuals that were badly written,
> inaccuracte, and incomplete thanks to contractors. NOT because the contractors
> themselves were inherently incompetent, but because they were not given
> sufficient time, access to the product, or respect.
Unfortunately all too true. Anyone who thinks a manual can be assembled
without adequate time and access either has never tried to write one, is
unusually talented, or is incompetent.
>
> This is a trend we should resist. One problem, though--contractors make way
> better money for the most part than employees. The low pay for employees is,
> I think, part of the respect problem.
Higher pay is all relative. Keep in mind that contractors have no
benefits. I've did a little of this before going back to school. I my
experience, the higher hourly rate did not begin to cover the higher
overhead: power for my system, paper, marketing time and costs, taxes,
etc., to say nothing of health insurance, unemployment compensation, and so
on--tabs which are generally picked up by employers so that employees don't
always see how they figure into the complete picture.