TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
We have been using Confluence - yes, augmented with lots and lots of
add-ons - without a lot of difficulty; certainly nothing like what seems to
be your experience.
We are a team of 25 (which includes two people doing technical support for
Confluence and other ancillary applications) and have been using it for 5+
years. While it has its quirks - what tool doesn't? - we find that it suits
our needs and is pretty easy to use. I've been a tech writer for 40+ years
and I quite like it. All of our development teams and many other internal
users use it all the time with few problems.
Chacun à son goÃt.
JG
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 3:03 PM Nina Barzgaran <nina -dot- barzgaran -at- barzgaran -dot- at>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have worked with Confluence for over 7 years now, nearly 4 of them
> using it as a Help Authoring Tool.
>
> I cannot recommend it as a 'HAT':
> for anything you want to do that is remotely connected to the common
> help authoring tasks, such as re-using content, snippets, variables,
> review workflow, version management (as opposed to a file/page change
> history) or custom CSS styling you need plugins.
> After some time, it lands you, simply put, in plugin hell, because the
> plugins even from the same vendor sometimes are not completely compatible.
>
> I'd recommend doing some research on *cloud-based Help Authoring Tools*.
> There are quite good ones out there, that offer a fine collaboration
> interface and in addition almost anything you could wish for in help
> authoring.
> MadCap Flare, which is my tool of choice, if I have a choice, even
> recently extended their cloud-features for the MadCap Central platform.
>
> Depending on the budget and (expected) size of documentation, other
> tools might be more appropriate.
> I can only say: beware of Confluence for help authoring!
> It's great as a wiki and collaboration platform, which it was designed
> for. Period.
>
> Nina
>
> Am 28/10/2020 um 16:00 schrieb John G:
> > Use Confluence as your help authoring tool. We do that for thousands of
> > pages of documentation, for multiple applications, in multiple languages.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 2:48 PM Deanna Korth <deanna -dot- korth -at- gmail -dot- com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> My company is looking to purchase a tool that will accept inputs from:
> >>
> >> - XML
> >> - Confluence
> >> - Word
> >>
> >> and that will output to:
> >>
> >> - HTML5
> >> - Word
> >> - PDF
> >> - Confluence
> >>
> >> We (they) want Confluence to be the source of truth because the
> engineers
> >> are used to writing documentation there. The kicker is keeping the help
> >> authoring system in sync with Confluence. Can you recommend a solution
> or
> >> tool?
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Deanna.
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy
> and
> >> content development | https://techwhirl.com
> >>
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>
> >> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as vwritert -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> >> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> >>
> >>
> >> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> >> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources
> and
> >> info.
> >>
> >> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our
> online
> >> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
> >>
> >> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> >> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Nina Barzgaran, M.A.
> Technical Communicator
> Linzer StraÃe 434-436/3/23
> 1140 Wien
> Ãsterreich
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and
> content development | https://techwhirl.com
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as vwritert -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
--
Please change the email address for John Garison to VwriterT -at- gmail -dot- com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | https://techwhirl.com