Re: It doesn't look good for Tina the Tech Writer ... OK, this makes for a good segue

[Steven Jong <stevefjong -at- comcast -dot- net>]

Doug Grossman <Doug -dot- Grossman -at- sas -dot- com> wrote:

> Best of evenings to you, Steven (and all),
> 
> Having been through both the original certification process as well as the newer version, I am very interested in your opinions on what made the original certification better than the current one. I hope that you won't mind expanding upon that.

I didnât mean to suggest the original certification was better. The original certification matches the current âexpertâ level (and is accepted as such), while the new certification is foundational. The intent is to have three tiers, including a âpractitionerâ level between these two.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- 

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications?  Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions?  Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives