Fwd: Font vs. Typeface

Subject: Fwd: Font vs. Typeface
From: Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:39:42 -0400

And on that note, I recommend *Linotype: the Film*.


> Chris

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca> wrote:

> Yeah. The digital revolution has totally messed up the purist. MW is
> totally right.
> My vote still goes to Ealasaid Haas as having the coolest answer through
> working with lead type as a hobby.
> -Tony
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives

Font vs. Typeface: From: Craig Lashley
RE: Font vs. Typeface: From: Janoff, Steven
Re: Font vs. Typeface: From: Tony Chung

Previous by Author: Re: Partial Screenshot Indicators
Next by Author: Re: Partial Screenshot Indicators
Previous by Thread: Re: Font vs. Typeface
Next by Thread: SharePoint: versions and workflows

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads