TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I just started working as a technical writer after having switched from librarianship (another profession the media, Forbes in particular, is fond of proclaiming dead) and I thought this article in The Economist was just terrible. I don't know how anyone could look objectively at a list that says technical writers are 8% more likely to be automated than word processors. I also wondered about their definition of "editor", which is listed as only 6% likely to be automated.
Thanks to Robert for providing the source... it's always helpful to have more information on where these "statistics" come from. People often see sensational numbers/headlines and don't stop to analyze them properly.
Its authors used an algorithm to guess which of 702 job
classifications are likely to be computerized. I think there's a flaw
in their algorithm and/or the source data ("literature on the task
content of employment" etc.), since tech writing consists of pretty
much the opposite of "tasks following well-defined procedures that can
easily be performed by sophisticated algorithms."
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Lois Patterson <loisrpatterson -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> Scroll down the page and you will see a chart about the probability that
> computerization will lead to job losses in the next two decades for
> specific professions, including accounting, telemarketing, retail sales,
> and technical writing. For telemarketing, this probability is 99%, and for
> technical writing, 89%. I'm sure this doesn't say anything we don't already
> know. The main question will be if new jobs open up that use traditional
> tech writing skills. I appreciated that the Economist including technical
> writing in its list, although I should point out that no specific
> definition is given, so I can't be sure it fits the definition that "we"
> have for the profession.
> This coincides with a podcast on Tom Johnson's site which discusses
> employment for technical writers, which basically suggests that outside of
> programming documentation, and documentation for governmental agencies, the
> outlook is rather bleak:
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1pJ4zPa