[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: [BULK] Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know

Subject: Re: [BULK] Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>, Mike McCallister <mike -dot- mccallister -at- pkware -dot- com>, Julie Stickler <jstickler -at- gmail -dot- com>, "Elissa K. Miller" <emiller -at- doubleknot -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:03:08 -0800

Mostly among people in the field. More or less the same way that "internet protocol" is mostly bandied about by people in tech fields. The average person on the street is no more likely to know either term than any of the other 300 or so definitions for the acronym.

http://www.acronymfinder.com/IP.html

Gene Kim-Eng

On 12/20/2013 9:12 AM, McLauchlan, Kevin wrote:

Yah but, was the term "IP" in general use in that context? Or would it have been just among lawyers, if it was?



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives

Follow-Ups:

References:
On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know: From: Elissa K. Miller
Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know: From: Julie Stickler
RE: [BULK] Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know: From: Mike McCallister
RE: [BULK] Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: [BULK] Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know: From: Gene Kim-Eng
RE: [BULK] Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know: From: McLauchlan, Kevin

Previous by Author: Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know
Next by Author: Re: 12 High-Paying Jobs For People Who Don't Like Math
Previous by Thread: RE: [BULK] Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know
Next by Thread: RE: [BULK] Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads