[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: [BULK] Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know

Subject: Re: [BULK] Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>, Mike McCallister <mike -dot- mccallister -at- pkware -dot- com>, Julie Stickler <jstickler -at- gmail -dot- com>, "Elissa K. Miller" <emiller -at- doubleknot -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:01:18 -0800

120 years ago, with the founding of the United International Bureaux for the Protection of Intellectual Property, which was superseded in 1967 by the UN's World Intellectual Property Organization.

One of the reasons why "common terms" in technical manual glossaries are useful is that many acronyms have multiple meanings and the technical ones are often the Johnny-come-lately ones.

Gene Kim-Eng


On 12/20/2013 7:26 AM, McLauchlan, Kevin wrote:

The "intellectual property" = "IP" thing started becoming popular (er.... sorry.... I meant "started gaining traction") years ago



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives

Follow-Ups:

References:
On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know: From: Elissa K. Miller
Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know: From: Julie Stickler
RE: [BULK] Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know: From: Mike McCallister
RE: [BULK] Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know: From: McLauchlan, Kevin

Previous by Author: Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know
Next by Author: Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know
Previous by Thread: RE: [BULK] Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know
Next by Thread: RE: [BULK] Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads