Re: PDF image quality challenge

Subject: Re: PDF image quality challenge
From: jackdeland -at- comcast -dot- net
To: Shawn C <shawn -at- convergent -dot- io>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:19:24 +0000 (UTC)

Hi Shawn -

Hmm. How did you integrate GhostScript with Flare?

Jack

----- Original Message -----

From: "Shawn C" <shawn -at- convergent -dot- io>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 1:57:11 PM
Subject: PDF image quality challenge

Hello all,

My first attempt at a new thread. Please be kind.

I already posted a similar message to the MadCap forum so the purpose of
this message is to explore this as a broader issue and hopefully discover
some best practices.

I am a brand-new (1 month) user of MadCap Flare, but a long time Adobe
FrameMaker and Microsoft Word technical writer. Recently, I have
encountered major issues with images when publishing a Flare project to a
PDF file. The problem is that, at less than 100% zoom level, images are
oddly pixelated (badly rendered).To add some clarity, my images are
generally inserted at slightly greater than 300 DPI. So, I am using
slightly higher than normal resolution... maintaining a balance of file
size vs image quality considerations.

I don't recall running into such image problems under Word or FrameMaker so
my finger is pointing is pointing at Flare.

After some experimentation, I found that by integrating GhostScript with
Flare, I can use .eps [vector] images, the results are images that render
perfect at all zoom levels, inside a PDF.

Part 1 of 2 solved! That is because the .eps format will obviously only
work on vector friendly images, like our corporate logo. Now, what do I do
about screen captures? Screen captures are a very important part of my
documentation. Any thoughts?


Thank you,
--
Shawn Connelly
technical writer


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as jackdeland -at- comcast -dot- net -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
PDF image quality challenge: From: Shawn C

Previous by Author: Re: SD Times: Tech Writers Should Be Pigs, Not Chickens
Next by Author: Re: Creating mobile help
Previous by Thread: PDF image quality challenge
Next by Thread: Re: PDF image quality challenge


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads