Re: Why I send these out -- was Re: Here's another winner - guess the pay

Subject: Re: Why I send these out -- was Re: Here's another winner - guess the pay
From: Suzette Leeming <suzette -dot- leeming -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "Porrello, Leonard" <lporrello -at- illumina -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:30:40 -0500

The decline in respect for bank tellers began during WW2, when men went off
to war, and women took on these positions to help support their families.
This was long before computerization, ATMs, etc.

I don't dispute that computerization in recent years was a major factor,
but it all started with the fact that they could pay women less.



On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Porrello, Leonard
<lporrello -at- illumina -dot- com>wrote:

> I wonder if there arenât contributing factors, such as computerization,
> like we see at the checkout counter at the grocery store. I remember when
> checkers entered everything by hand and had the prices of a great deal of
> product memorized. I wonder if banking has undergone a similar
> transformation and this, rather than gender politics, is what has driven
> down wages. If this is the case, then the analogy would pertain only if a
> methodology comes along that makes tech writing as easy as running a bar
> code across a scanner and counting change. I'm thinking that Wikihelp is a
> step in that direction.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+lporrello=illumina -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:
> techwr-l-bounces+lporrello=illumina -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of
> Suzette Leeming
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:16 PM
> To: Milan DavidoviÄ
> Cc: TECHWR-L mailinglist
> Subject: Re: Why I send these out -- was Re: Here's another winner - guess
> the pay
>
> Bank tellers.
>
> This profession used to be a professional one, and people used to be able
> to support their families in this line of work. Bank tellers now earn a
> lot less (usually $10-$15/hr), are often part time jobs with few benefits
> or job security, and may or may not be related to the fact that this once
> primarily male-dominated profession is now predominately a female
> profession (since WW2).
>
> Suzette Leeming
>
> 2012/1/31 Milan DavidoviÄ <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com>
>
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:01 PM, William Sherman
> > <bsherman77 -at- embarqmail -dot- com> wrote:
> > > This may seem like it is only about one place offering a $10 per
> > > hour
> > job,
> > > but it only takes one crack in the dam left ignored for the whole
> > > dam to eventually fail.
> >
> > Assuming that the dam metaphor is applicable, that is. I'm not so
> > sure, but I might start to be convinced if you could point to an
> > analogous case in another line of work of "ignoring the dam".
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Here's another winner - guess the pay: From: William Sherman
Re: Here's another winner - guess the pay: From: Julie Stickler
Re: Here's another winner - guess the pay: From: Suzette Leeming
Re: Here's another winner - guess the pay: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Here's another winner - guess the pay: From: Peter Neilson
Re: Here's another winner - guess the pay: From: Laura Lemay
Why I send these out -- was Re: Here's another winner - guess the pay: From: William Sherman
Re: Why I send these out -- was Re: Here's another winner - guess the pay: From: Milan Davidović
Re: Why I send these out -- was Re: Here's another winner - guess the pay: From: Suzette Leeming
RE: Why I send these out -- was Re: Here's another winner - guess the pay: From: Porrello, Leonard

Previous by Author: Re: Why I send these out -- was Re: Here's another winner - guess the pay
Next by Author: TECHWR-L Premium Jobs, Events, and Announcements
Previous by Thread: RE: Why I send these out -- was Re: Here's another winner - guess the pay
Next by Thread: RE: Why I send these out -- was Re: Here's another winner - guess the pay


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads