Re: Nobody reviewed the manuals

Subject: Re: Nobody reviewed the manuals
From: <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: Al Geist <al -dot- geist -at- geistassociates -dot- com>, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:37:10 -0400

---- Al Geist <al -dot- geist -at- geistassociates -dot- com> wrote:
> ... consequences many other companies (small or large) have had their eyes opened?

"Why worry? We have the manuals, they are on the shelf, and they have been checked to see that they meet specifications." For shipboard use (and an offshore drilling rig is a marine vessel) the manuals presumably have to meet some sort of weight requirements, so they match the number that was previously entered into the ballast calculations for figuring the metacentric height of the vessel.

-Peter Neilson


Gain access to everything you need to create and publish documentation,
manuals, and other information through multiple channels. Choose
authoring (and import) as well as virtually any output you may need.

- Use this space to communicate with TECHWR-L readers -
- Contact admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com for more information -

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:

Nobody reviewed the manuals: From: Al Geist

Previous by Author: Re: Step One. Done.
Next by Author: Re: Nobody reviewed the manuals
Previous by Thread: Re: Nobody reviewed the manuals
Next by Thread: Re: Nobody reviewed the manuals

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads