TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Re: Not an acronymn.... From:"Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Thu, 20 May 2010 10:42:16 -0800
The traditional definitions of abbreviation and acronym should both exclude "K9," because there is neither a "K" nor a "9" in the word "canine," and because it isn't a real word it shouldn't be considered a hompohone, which is a word that has the same pronunciation as another word but a different meaning.
The closest term I can think of is "pseudo-acronym," which refers to a construct that is used as if it's an acronym but cannot be expanded to some form of the word it's intended to represent.
Gene Kim-Eng
------- Original Message -------
On 5/20/2010 6:02 PM Dossy Shiobara wrote:
Actually, the numeronym of "canine" would be C4E, not K9. "K9" is an abbreviation and homophone.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Gain access to everything you need to create and publish documentation,
manuals, and other information through multiple channels. Choose
authoring (and import) as well as virtually any output you may need. http://www.doctohelp.com/
- Use this space to communicate with TECHWR-L readers -
- Contact admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com for more information -
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-