TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Serious follow-up to the automated telephone system thing
Subject:RE: Serious follow-up to the automated telephone system thing From:"Combs, Richard" <richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com> To:"John Posada" <jposada99 -at- gmail -dot- com>, "Downing, David" <david -dot- downing -at- fiserv -dot- com> Date:Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:55:32 -0600
John Posada wrote:
> And their justification for this is?
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Downing, David
> <david -dot- downing -at- fiserv -dot- com> wrote:
>
> > There is, in fact, a reason why those automated telephone support
systems
> are so nerve-racking. I read about it a long time ago in an article in
> TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION. It seems that those systems are actually
doing
> something that the police do to try and break criminals in a hostage
> situation -- repeatedly force someone to make choices among
alternatives.
> The police do it with the intention of making the kidnapper finally
say, "I
> give up! I'm coming out!" So those automated systems are breaking you
down
> in a similar fashion.
Short of scrapping all IVR systems entirely, there is no alternative. A
human can negotiate and ask open-ended questions. An IVR system can't.
Of necessity, it must ask you to choose from a limited menu of
alternatives.
How could it function in a way that _didn't_ "force"* you to make
choices? "Explain to me in detail what you're calling about and the
artificial intelligence in my bank of supercomputers will analyze and
respond in a way that might pass a Turing test"? Not any time soon.
Scrapping IVR entirely isn't going to happen, either. Rooms full of
switchboard operators have gone the way of elevator operators, theater
ushers, and gas station attendants. The increased productivity and cost
cutting/containment have generally been a good thing -- except for the
teenagers who have job opportunities because minimum wage increases have
killed many entry-level jobs and priced them out of the labor market.
* You're not really being _forced_, you know. Cops with guns can force
you to do something, IVR systems can't. You're free to hang up, or to
employ the methods at gethuman.com.
Richard
Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Polycom, Inc.
richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
303-223-5111
------
rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom
303-777-0436
------
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals. http://www.doctohelp.com
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-