RE: The case against M$ Word

Subject: RE: The case against M$ Word
From: "Stephen Arrants" <steve -at- mbfbioscience -dot- com>
To: <chrismorton11 -at- gmail -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:31:55 -0400

In that case, perhaps some of us are sorry we answered.



From: Chris Morton [mailto:salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 2:28 PM
To: Stephen Arrants; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: The case against M$ Word



Sheesh.... sorry I asked. > Chris

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Stephen Arrants
<steve -at- mbfbioscience -dot- com> wrote:

I've been following this in the background, sitting on my hands....

Richard Combs is right. You need a document-oriented tool. You can get
acceptable, usable documents out of WORD. For long print documents or
print documents where you're going to be reusing content a lot, I'd look
at FRAME (incidentally, they've been predicting the Death of Frame since
Adobe took it over in what? 1995?)

I've been using WORD since before it was for Windows, and even I know
when it is and when it isn't the right tool. For most tasks, WORD is
great because nearly everyone has WORD. For most tasks, WORD can be a
royal PITA because nearly everyone thinks that they can use WORD without
any training.

Some questions to ask...
* What is the longest individual document you can see yourself
producing?
* How will you structure your document?
* How many illustrations will you have in a document?
* Will the document be part of a multi-document set (separate chapter
files? Completely separate books?)
* Will you ever need to produce online documentation from the original
document(s)?
* Reviews-how will they happen? Hard copy? PDF or native files?
I guess what I'm getting at is, first define what you want a document to
be, and then what you want it to look like. You may need to make
compromises for a "best fit". I've used all the tools talked about on
this thread, and my gut feeling is that FRAME is probably the best bet.
YMMV, of course.


--
Steve Arrants steve -at- mbfbioscience -dot- com
Writer
MBF Bioscience (Microbrightfield, Inc.)
+1.802.288.9290 ext: 124
www.mbfbioscience.com <http://www.mbfbioscience.com/>







^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
http://www.doctohelp.com

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


References:
The case against M$ Word: From: Chris Morton
Re: The case against M$ Word: From: Chris Morton
RE: The case against M$ Word: From: Ed
Re: The case against M$ Word: From: Chris Morton
RE: The case against M$ Word: From: Combs, Richard
RE: The case against M$ Word: From: Stephen Arrants
Re: The case against M$ Word: From: Chris Morton

Previous by Author: RE: The case against M$ Word
Next by Author: RE: The case against M$ Word
Previous by Thread: Re: The case against M$ Word
Next by Thread: A doozy even for Word


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads