Re: The case against M$ Word

Subject: Re: The case against M$ Word
From: "Chris Morton" <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "Stephen Arrants" <steve -at- mbfbioscience -dot- com>, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:28:01 -0700

Sheesh.... sorry I asked. > Chris

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Stephen Arrants
<steve -at- mbfbioscience -dot- com>wrote:

> I've been following this in the background, sitting on my hands....
>
> Richard Combs is right. You need a document-oriented tool. You can get
> acceptable, usable documents out of WORD. For long print documents or print
> documents where you're going to be reusing content a lot, I'd look at FRAME
> (incidentally, they've been predicting the Death of Frame since Adobe took
> it over in what? 1995?)
>
> I've been using WORD since before it was for Windows, and even I know when
> it is and when it isn't the right tool. For most tasks, WORD is great
> because nearly everyone has WORD. For most tasks, WORD can be a royal PITA
> because nearly everyone thinks that they can use WORD without any training.
>
> Some questions to ask...
> * What is the longest individual document you can see yourself producing?
> * How will you structure your document?
> * How many illustrations will you have in a document?
> * Will the document be part of a multi-document set (separate chapter
> files? Completely separate books?)
> * Will you ever need to produce online documentation from the original
> document(s)?
> * Reviews-how will they happen? Hard copy? PDF or native files?
> I guess what I'm getting at is, first define what you want a document to
> be, and then what you want it to look like. You may need to make compromises
> for a "best fit". I've used all the tools talked about on this thread, and
> my gut feeling is that FRAME is probably the best bet. YMMV, of course.
>
>
> --
> Steve Arrants steve -at- mbfbioscience -dot- com
> Writer
> MBF Bioscience (Microbrightfield, Inc.)
> +1.802.288.9290 ext: 124
> www.mbfbioscience.com
>
>
>
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
http://www.doctohelp.com

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Follow-Ups:

References:
The case against M$ Word: From: Chris Morton
Re: The case against M$ Word: From: Chris Morton
RE: The case against M$ Word: From: Ed
Re: The case against M$ Word: From: Chris Morton
RE: The case against M$ Word: From: Combs, Richard
RE: The case against M$ Word: From: Stephen Arrants

Previous by Author: Re: The case against M$ Word
Next by Author: Re: The case against M$ Word
Previous by Thread: RE: The case against M$ Word
Next by Thread: RE: The case against M$ Word


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads