RE: Justified versus ragged right

Subject: RE: Justified versus ragged right
From: "Combs, Richard" <richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com>
To: "Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:20:40 -0600

Dan Goldstein wrote:

> Is FrameMaker (as used in Sean's experiment, which seems to
empirically
> (!) contradict Geoff's theory), a "smart" justification tool or a
"dumb"
> one?

Sean Brierley replied:

> Entirely dumb, of course. I wasn't approaching the question of
interword
> spacing, though, just page count.

I can't speak to how FrameMaker compares with the "really smart" tools
used by book publishers, but I don't think it qualifies as entirely
dumb.

If you check Allow Automatic Letter Spacing (on the Advanced tab of the
Paragraph Designer), FM will adjust not just word spacing, but also
letter spacing (both pair kerning and tracking). In addition, you can
set the maximum, minimum, and optimum word spacing to adjust how tightly
or loosely FM sets lines.

You can also manually adjust spread (tracking). I suppose you'd have to
fiddle with individual pgfs to get really great results, but if you make
wise choices in your pgf format definitions, the automatic settings will
give far better results than you get from pure word spacing.

All that said, I prefer and exclusively use ragged right with no
hyphenation. :-)

Richard


Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Polycom, Inc.
richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
303-223-5111
------
rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom
303-777-0436
------





^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
http://www.doctohelp.com

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


References:
RE: Justified versus ragged right: From: Downing, David
RE: Justified versus ragged right: From: Fred Ridder
RE: Justified versus ragged right: From: Dan Goldstein

Previous by Author: RE: Curly quotes in Frame cross-references
Next by Author: RE: The case against M$ Word
Previous by Thread: RE: Justified versus ragged right
Next by Thread: FWD: Career transition away from tech writing


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads