TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Many people say titles don't matter, others think they mean everything.
I believe it's a combination of the two.
If you are content with your title, the people around you recognize what
you are doing, and the remuneration is acceptable - then no problem.
Usually, a change in title, I believe, is merited if:
- The people you work with perceive the title differently from you and
there is no way to re-educate them appropriately
- The job title is linke to remuneration and prevents you from moving
ahead
- There is a marked inconsistency between what your title is and what
you actually DO.
In one of my jobs, a change in title brought no pay raise, but huge
respect amongst my colleagues, and made it a lot easier for me to
accomplish certain tasks....
I hope this helps...
Deborah
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+dhemstreet=kaydon -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+dhemstreet=kaydon -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
Behalf Of beelia
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 10:10 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Senior Tech Writer classification
Hi all,
Like many of you, I've been classified as a Senior Tech Writer for a
very
long time - about 20 years now. Recently my startup was acquired by a
fairly
large company, and I thought maybe this might be a good time to find a
more
appropriate career track, since 100% of my job is online help. Although
they
made me a generous offer (which I accepted), I was worried that I might
be
nearing the top of my classification.
The HR director broke the Catbert mold and suggested I write up my job
description ,and they'd try to find another niche for me. He warned me
they
use Radford standards, which are notoriously broad and not particularly
accurate.
I decided to poke around on the web to see if I could find other jobs
listed
that require markup languages, Java, JavaScript, DITA, authoring tools,
along with an engineering education and experience in high tech
industries
like networking and telecomm. Alas, I found that practically all of
those
skills are commonly listed under "Senior Technical Writer".
At that point, I realized that most of my future colleagues at that
company
are probably in the same boat, and perhaps I shouldn't be rocking it.
After
I got assurances from HR that there is room to move financially on the
STW
track, and that they're totally OK with printing "Online Help Developer"
on
my business cards, I decided to drop the matter.
So now I'm curious - have many of you been stuck in this classification?
If
so, do you care?
In short, do job titles matter? Has public perception of secretaries or
stewardesses changed because they are now known as administrative
assistants
or flight attendants?
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help gives you everything you need to author and
publish quality Help, Web, and print content. Perfect for technical
authors, developers, and policy writers. Download a FREE trial. http://www.componentone.com/DocToHelp/
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-