TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
A big thanks to all, for your meaningful contributions to this discussion.
Things appeared pretty hazy when I started off with this project two days
back. I was apprehensive about the choice I had to make.
As I write this, thanks to Techwhirlers, I feel sure about what I need to do
and have already put a documentation plan in place.
Thanks a lot folks.
Raj
On 6/12/07, Pinkham, Jim <Jim -dot- Pinkham -at- voith -dot- com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Sheila --
>
> Here's what I can tell you. I used both Word import and the table
> feature often in a prior life, but in the interest of full disclosure,
> I'll also admit I haven't worked with Quark daily in a couple of years,
> and I don't have a Quark reference on my desktop at the moment. So a few
> general comments and then I'll point you to some resources.
>
> * Table or not, make sure the Word file you'll be exporting is as clean
> as you can make it. Get rid of unused styles, extra spaces, hidden tabs,
> and similar formatting crud before trying to bring anything over.
> * Quark has been able to handle tables since the advent of the Table
> Tool in QXP 5, and QXP 6 advanced that tool's somewhat basic
> capabilities. As I recall, I spent some time tinkering at the table cell
> level to get the formats that were underlying the table to show up once
> I'd brought it to Quark. You may need to do some upfront style
> definitions in Word, too. I would not be surprised if things were a
> little more straightforward now that QXP 7 versions are available, and a
> little digging should confirm whether this is so. In Quark's own words
> re: ver 7: "In QuarkXPress 7, table features have been enhanced to
> support splitting tables, running headers and footers, and transparency
> controls that extend to individual cells and borders. With the
> QuarkXPress 7 tables features, you can easily combine text and graphics
> and benefit from tight integration with Microsoft Excel for both design-
> and content-driven grids."
> * I found the "Real World" and "Bible" series of Quark books very
> helpful. Check
>http://www.amazon.com/Real-World-QuarkXPress/dp/0321350308/ref=pd_bbs_2/
> 105-2878600-0412452?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1181662794&sr=1-2 for details on
> David Blatner's update of his work for QXP 7. Blatner's version for QXP
> 6 has a significant discussion of tables.
> * Anne-Marie "Her Geekness" Concepcion provides an excellent list of QXP
> resources at: http://www.senecadesign.com/designgeek/quark.html.
> * A post to the QXP list, a search of its archives, or both are probably
> your best bets for the most current answers and/or the ones most
> pertinent to your setup. Again, check out
>http://www.siclist.org/mailman/listinfo/quarkxpress. A search such as
> the following may turn up another useful list or two to query:
>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1
> &q=quarkxpress+list&spell=1.
> * FYI, there's a detailed description of a process for bringing an Excel
> table to QXP at
>http://www.quark.com/service/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6384, at
>http://www.creativepro.com/story/howto/22921.html?origin=story, and
> another helpful article on imports, also focused on Excel, at
>http://www.senecadesign.com/designgeek/dgarchives/designgeek18.php#excel
> tables. I realize we were talking about Word, but some of the process
> should be transferable. Worst case, you could select the table in Word,
> paste into Excel, and import the worksheet. Personally, I never had to
> do that.
> * Finally, you might also consider XTensions, such as the tool suites
> that include table offerings from Gluon or onOne (QX-Tools) software.
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reffelt, Sheila [mailto:Sheila -dot- Reffelt -at- alcoa -dot- com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 9:44 AM
> To: Pinkham, Jim; Raj Machhan; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: RE: QuarkXPress 7 vs Adobe InDesign CS
>
> I am currently a big fan of Quark.
> I use it exclusively for publishing applications (instruction manuals
> with graphics and product bulletins), so bias is obvious.
> But tell me, Jim:
> I have never been successful in "... bringing
> in Word documents, including formatted tabular material,".
> HOW DO YOU DO THAT???
> Thanks.
> Sheila
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pinkham, Jim [mailto:Jim -dot- Pinkham -at- voith -dot- com]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 11:25 AM
> To: Raj Machhan; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: RE: QuarkXPress 7 vs Adobe InDesign CS
>
> With the usual caveats of "depends upon your situation" and "your
> mileage may vary," I think it's safe to say that both are strong
> applications, and either one could likely handle such a task well,
> depending on what you mean by "user guide." Depending on how long and
> complex the documentation, Frame could be an obvious choice, too.
>
> Quark is the older and more established desktop publishing program and
> is widely used in newspaper and magazine publishing. Personally, it
> would be my choice of the two, but that's tinged by the fact that I've
> used Quark and not InDesign. Either can integrate well with Acrobat and
> Illustrator within a workflow. Quark also does a decent job of bringing
> in Word documents, including formatted tabular material, without a lot
> of bumps. If you are already using other Adobe products, such as
> Acrobat, Illustrator, Photoshop, etc., you may find the learning curve
> less steep with InDesign because of similarities within the product
> family.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+jim -dot- pinkham=voith -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+jim -dot- pinkham=voith -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
> Behalf Of Raj Machhan
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:09 AM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: QuarkXPress 7 vs Adobe InDesign CS
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anybody used QuarkXPress or Adobe InDesign to create User Guides? I
> gather these are primarily page layout applications with advanced design
> and typesetting features. I need to make a choice between the two to
> create a design-intensive User Guide. Can anybody tell me which one of
> these is ideal for such a job?
>
> Best
>
> Raj
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats
> or printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista &
> 2007 Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
>http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
>
> True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
> Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
> documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as Jim -dot- Pinkham -at- voith -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/jim.pinkham%40voith.c
> om
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-