TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Giving up on XML From:Chris Borokowski <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Tue, 27 Mar 2007 06:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Human intelligence seems to rule the day, or human
discipline. While I see the advantages to structured
communication, I don't know if writers can be forced
to use it. At the end of the day, structure comes from
project leadership and oversight.
--- Mike Starr <mikestarr-techwr-l -at- writestarr -dot- com>
wrote:
> It also occurs to me that adopting a tool that
> imposes structured
> documentation doesn't do anything at all to impose
> consistent structure. I
> can have a boatload of content that's all structured
> with none of it
> structurally similar.
>
> Mike
> --
> Mike Starr WriteStarr
> Information Services
> Technical Writer - Online Help Developer -
> Website developer
> Graphic Designer - Desktop Publisher -
> MS Office Expert
> Phone: (262) 694-1028 - Tollfree: (877) 892-1028 -
> Fax:(262) 697-6334
> Email: mike -at- writestarr -dot- com - Web:
>http://www.writestarr.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Borokowski" <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com>
> To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:04 AM
> Subject: Re: Giving up on XML
>
> >I was intrigued by this recent writing:
> >
> > "The most commonly-stated reasons for adopting
> > structured documentation techniques include:
> > Automation, Reuse, Single-sourcing, Productivity
> gains
> > (resulting from the above)
> >
> > However, none of these (or other) advantages
> require
> > structuring at all. Non-SGML markup languages such
> as
> > troff or TeX, and even help-authoring tools like
> > RoboHelp, all allow automation, reuse, and
> > single-sourcing.
> >
> > Another purported benefit of structured authoring
> is
> > that it enforces consistency both within a
> document
> > and across a suite of related documents. Again,
> > structure is not necessary to gain this benefit: a
> > properly-designed style sheet (combined with good
> > old-fashioned peer pressure) is sufficient."
> >
> >
> http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-BLFrRSM1crQ40jjr38W8Q2JQtELQ?p=9
> >
> > I agree on some levels: structured documents, like
> > virtualization, are an overhyped trend.
> >
> > On another level, I find them useful in that they
> are
> > often machine parseable.
> >
> > On still another level, I find the convergence of
> RDF
> > and XML interesting as XML is a structural markup,
> > while RDF is a value-typing/definitional markup.
> >
> > Kollar made some good points about the utility of
> > simply a style sheet and some common sense. I
> think
> > the dumbing-down of authoring to the point where
> > machines could do it is a silly idea. On the other
> > hand, I like the thought of writing information
> into
> > an XML format, tagging it with RDF-style
> definitional
> > markup, and then putting a kind of data tainting
> on it
> > so it knows where to go, whether a public CMS or a
> > private intranet. Letting the machines work for
> us, in
> > other words.
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to
> Help file formats or
> printed documentation. Features include single
> source authoring, team authoring,
> Web-based technology, and PDF output.
>http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
>
> Now shipping: Help & Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r)
> import! New editor,
> full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based
> help and PDF in up
> to 106 languages with Help & Manual:
>http://www.helpandmanual.com
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as
> athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
> http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/athloi%40yahoo.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to
> techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
> Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more
> resources and info.
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
Now shipping: Help & Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help & Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-