TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Carla Martinek wrote...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rebecca Fleischer
>
> >> At my last job, I used FrameMaker for years, but then the developers
> >> wanted our documentation converted to word to make it easier for them
> >> to do reviews.
>
>
> Oh, this is *such* a pet peeve of mine! I've run into this in the past
> where reviewers complain, "Why can't you write in Word like everyone
> else?"
One of the problems in writing in Word is that the reviewers feel they should create the revised document for me. Instead of writing a note, "Change fooby to Fooby throughout, and mark Foobymu as a trademark," they'll put a lot of effort into trying to *do* all that. Or sometimes they'll have a 3 MB file of XML and stuff that contains 17 lines of info that I'll actually need for the document. I'll get the doc e-mailed back to me with the 3 MB inserted as an appendix, and my Outlook mailbox overflows.
Multiply that by eight or ten reviewers for a document and four simultaneous projects, and it's kind of obvious why I prefer the comments not be included in the document file, especially if it's MS Word and I'm working in a MS-only environment. "Merge" eight reviews? No thank you, I'll *read* them and put the changes into my own unruined copy of the document.
--Peter Neilson, wearing his brilliantly-colored Curmudgeon Hat
PS: I'm tempted to use the phrase "MS Word Considered Harmful" but I notice that someone in Norway has already said it. Read http://grendel.no/misc/ms-word-considered-harmful.pdf if you don't mind plowing through some Norwegian. His point of view seems to be that LaTex produces better-looking Norwegian output, while mine (and a lot of youse guys') is that it just ain't suited for tech writing.
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
Now shipping: Help & Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help & Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-