RE: Word numbering best practice question?

Subject: RE: Word numbering best practice question?
From: "Brierley, Sean" <Sean -dot- Brierley -at- ipc -dot- com>
To: <kmurri -at- comcast -dot- net>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 15:24:10 -0500

Well, with one caveat ... I plan to use the outline numbering on Word's
pre-existing List Number styles.

...

________________________________

From: kmurri -at- comcast -dot- net [mailto:kmurri -at- comcast -dot- net]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 3:15 PM
To: Chinell, David F (GE Indust, Security); TECHWR-L; Brierley, Sean
Subject: RE: Word numbering best practice question?


I have to disagree. As I said in my previous post, I've had good luck
using outline numbering as I described. I had some of the typical
numbering problems you're trying to avoid before I figured this out. You
don't have to manually number sub-steps. You can use outline numbering
successfully, and even painlessly, if you set it up right in a clean
template with the styles attached to the outline levels. Granted, you
need to use Word as only power users seem to, but the same is true of
the SEQ practice.

-Karen


Bear said:
>
> IF you must have multiple levels, then you need to force your writers
to type in
> the substep letters manually (also not bad, as it discourages
substeps) OR go
> with the Outline Numbered tab.


DISCLAIMER:
Important Notice *************************************************
This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail.E-mail messages may contain computer viruses or other defects, may not be accurately replicated on other systems, or may be intercepted, deleted or interfered with without the knowledge of the sender or the intended recipient. If you are not comfortable with the risks associated with e-mail messages, you may decide not to use e-mail to communicate with IPC. IPC reserves the right, to the extent and under circumstances permitted by applicable law, to retain, monitor and intercept e-mail messages to and from its systems.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

Now shipping: Help &amp; Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help &amp; Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: Word numbering best practice question?: From: kmurri

Previous by Author: RE: Word numbering best practice question?
Next by Author: RE: Opening TIFFs from a Browser
Previous by Thread: RE: Word numbering best practice question?
Next by Thread: RE: Word numbering best practice question?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads