Re: Seybold column: Why Tables for Layout Is Stupid
Interesting question. I use both nested HTML tables and CSS in my web pages and I've been thinking about moving away from nested tables toward more CSS. Since I host my own domain, I have control over where the CSS files reside, so I have yet to encounter a reliability problem (except when I loaded the wrong CSS file once....it wasn't pretty). There are a few websites that I know of which rely totally on CSS for layout rather than tables (www.vermont.com <http://www.vermont.com> comes to mind). It is my understanding that website development and content development are accomplished at different locations and yet their pages load quickly and with few, if any, reliability problems.
BTW, do distributed CSS files load more reliably than nested HTML tables?
Yet, this is only one web site. It would be interesting to learn the pros and cons of nest tables versus CSS and how that may affect technical content development.
Al
--
Al Geist
Technical Writing, Online Help, Marketing Collateral, Web Design, Award Winning Videos, Professional Photography
Voice/Msg: 802-658-3140
Cell: 802-578-3964
E-mail: al -dot- geist -at- geistassociates -dot- com <mailto:al -dot- geist -at- geistassociates -dot- com>
URL: www.geistassociates.com <http://www.geistassociates.com> (online portfolio/resume)
See also:
URL: www.geistimages.com <http://www.geistimages.com> (fine art prints for home for office, and note cards for all occasions)
"When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer "Present" or "Not guilty.""
Theodore Roosevelt
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com
To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
Follow-Ups:
- Re: Seybold column: Why Tables for Layout Is Stupid, Ethan Metsger
References:
Re: Seybold column: Why Tables for Layout Is Stupid: From: Mike Starr
Re: Seybold column: Why Tables for Layout Is Stupid: From: Ned Bedinger
Previous by Author:
Re: Seybold column: Why Tables for Layout Is Stupid
Next by Author:
Re: Adobe weirdness
Previous by Thread:
Re: Seybold column: Why Tables for Layout Is Stupid
Next by Thread:
Re: Seybold column: Why Tables for Layout Is Stupid
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads