RE: Tech Spec vs Functional Spec was RE: What are you working on?

["Dori Green" <dgreen -at- associatedbrands -dot- com>]

Richard Lewis wrote:

<it is a Functional Specification that is so unfunctional that no one dares
call it such.  So, to call it something, they give it the catch-all name of
Techincal Specification.>

Yikes!  By extrapolation, does _that_ explain why some of us are called
"technical writers" even when we're writing about business processes rather
than technology?  Somebody decided that we were unfunctional writers so we
must be technical writers?????

Dori Green

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help 
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content 
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot- 

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.