Re: A question about evaluations

Subject: Re: A question about evaluations
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:05:16 -0700

These are the things I consider "red flags" in employee evaluations:

1. As an employee, your evaluation at the end of the year cites issues with your performance in areas that were never documented as part of your objectives or brought to your
attention as issues that could affect your evaluation, either at the beginning of the year or during it, or you are downrated for unsatisfactory performance in something that was a small part of your objectives or not part of them at all even while being highly rated for the major objective/s.

2. As a manager, you rate your employees based on their
performance to objectives but upper management alters
their evaluations to lower ratings.

3. As a manager, you are required to rank your employees along
a curve that forces one or more of them "below average" even
if they outperformed all their objectives.

If #1 occurs, someone (most likely your own manager) wants you
gone for some reason and is setting the stage for it. If #2 or #3
occur, your organization is either dysfunctional, is looking at
imminent cost cuts that will result in you being required to RIF
some of your employees, or both. Any one of the above should
be a signal to you and/or your manager that it's time to tweak
that resume and start putting out feelers. More than one is a
signal that you should do it today.
Gene Kim-Eng

----- Original Message ----- From: "Jones, Donna" <DJones -at- zebra -dot- com>

One real drawback to performance evaluations is that they usually are
subjective, so they can be biased against you even if you're doing
everything asked of you. Evaluations can also be used to set you up if
the company wants to get rid of you but wants to lessen the risk you
winning if you sue them for discrimination. For example, "This woman was
let go after a bad evaluation for the past year, not because she's

I heard that some companies set dumb rules such as requiring that a
certain number of people in every department be ranked "below average,"
regardless of how they actually did at their jobs (kind of like a bell
curve for employees). Then in the next round of layoffs, guess who are
the first to go? That sounds to me like a quick way to lower morale
across the board and lose decent employees. You'd be working scared all
the time, never knowing where you rank in relation to your coworkers.


WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content delivery. Try it today!

Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: A question about evaluations: From: Jones, Donna

Previous by Author: Re: A question about evaluations
Next by Author: Re: IIBA Certification
Previous by Thread: Re: A question about evaluations
Next by Thread: A question about evaluations?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads