RE: browseable vs browsable

Subject: RE: browseable vs browsable
From: "Jessica Weissman" <Jessica -dot- Weissman -at- hillcrestlabs -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:30:17 -0400

Thanks to all who have confirmed that browsable is the better choice
between the two spellings.

I agree that it is jargon, but jargon is precisely what is needed here,
as we are distinguishing among several types of
find/browse/graze/discover/serendipitize/stumble over in describing some
content consumption modes for our user interface.

The document audience will be fully jargon-capable. It's not for a user
guide or anything else that will be read by regular users.

Jessica Weissman
Hillcrest Laboratories


WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!

Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: Do you edit with your mouth open?
Next by Author: RE: Browseable vs browsable?
Previous by Thread: Browseable vs browsable?
Next by Thread: Conditional Build Expressions "Magically" Disappearing

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads