TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Question about copyrights and "open" standards. From:Geoff Hart <ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>, Matthew Kaster <matthewkaster -at- yahoo -dot- com> Date:Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:10:14 -0400
Matthew Kaster wondered: <<I've recently been asked to write the
technical manual for a new CPU board designed by a small local
company. The board is based on a form factor that (I've been told)
is an "Open" standard. Several other manufactures are already
selling boards based on this spec. The design guides and technical
specification papers are all freely available on the web, but they
are also clearly copyrighted. In this case the copyright holder is
the biggest manufacturer in that industry. This is all new to me, so
I said “play it safe” and get permission to use the information.>>
That's the correct way to proceed. You can't use someone else's
copyrighted material "as is" without their permission. And get that
permission in writing. But the "as is" part is the interesting part:
see below for more.
<<But the Project Manager who hired me does not want me to contact
the company that owns the copyright (since the new board will soon be
in direct competition with their product).>>
If your manager doesn't want to do this, then you shouldn't do it.
You could cause serious trouble for your employer if the copyright
holder decided to use the knowledge of your existence to squash you
as a competitor. But really, if they're "the biggest in the
industry", why would they bother? It's not like you'll be posing any
threat to them. After all, they haven't tried to squash "several
other manufacturers", so why would they bother you? The manager's
logic seems highly suspect.
<<My question: If a specification paper is freely available but
copyrighted, are the numbers considered copyright material as well?>>
Emphatically not. Copyright protects the actual expression of
information, not the information itself. This is why you can legally
write a research paper based on information published in
encyclopedias, journal articles, and Web sites. It's also why you can
write "boy meets girl, boy marries girl" fiction: it's not like
there's anything new about the plot, after all. <g>
<<Can I include stuff like mechanical dimensions, maximum ratings,
etc, and mention what they are based on and where I got them?>>
The simplest and safest solution is to simply refer readers to the
copyright holder's Web site (the address of the specification). As a
general rule, you should be safe if you use your own words (where
clear alternatives exist) rather than those of the copyright holder,
and do your own layout.
But the legal aspects of the problem is a bit more interesting than
that, however: since you'll effectively be repeating _all_ of the
information provided by the copyright holder, a good lawyer could
claim that you violated their copyright. "Fair use" is intended to
protect our ability to reuse information, but there's an implicit
understanding that it doesn't mean "all" of the information.
On the other hand, though I'm an educated layman on this topic, I'm
not a lawyer. If your manager is seriously concerned about this, get
a second opinion from a copyright lawyer--***NOT*** from a general
lawyer. Different expertise.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
Geoff Hart ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca
(try geoffhart -at- mac -dot- com if you don't get a reply)