TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: User Guides in Quark Express or InDesign From:"Poshedly, Ken" <PoshedlyK -at- polysius -dot- com> To:"Al Geist" <al -dot- geist -at- geistassociates -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:18:32 -0400
Previous to my arrival as the only tech writer at my company (I'm a
contractor), all docs were produced by the various engineers. Therefore,
Word was used, so as to allow the engineers to edit the docs as they
wish) and that was that.
I much prefer FrameMaker, but due to the need for potential edits by
engineers, it probably ain't gonna happen here.
And my extreme distaste for Word has been pushed to even a higher level
over the past months while I watched it arbitrarily perform lots of
unintended stunts with my work - for instance, undo / remove text and /
or formatting in my manuals.
Yes, I've gone through online helps and tutorials to ensure I was doing
everything correctly, etc.
I even showed a few engineering coworkers firsthand how the tagging of a
paragraph as "List Bullet" somehow resulted in the removal of bullets
from ALL 30 instances of paragraphs with this same tag!!!!!!! Thank GOD
for multiple "UNDO"!!!!!!! So I could get my stuff back to before and do
a workaround!! to get the measly bullet I needed for this one last
instance!!!
I tried to use Word to produce a scientific journal about 5 years ago. I
figured that I could simply produce each article separately, and then
somehow string them together to produce the full-length book (approx 60
pages).
So I spent several hours composing / arranging the first story -
complete with images - and then saved the file and powered down. Upon
opening the file the next day, images had shifted all over the place.
And no, I don't know how it happened!! So I spent more time getting all
back together, saving it and closing and reopening the file and it still
looked good. But once more, the next day when I reopened the file, it
had shuffled again.
So it's been FrameMaker ever since and I've never looked back (except
here at my office where I'm stuck).
I'm sure many of you have published thousand-page books using Word with
no problem, but not me.
I still remember two VERY important things about this:
* I've been told that Microsoft itself uses FrameMaker to produce its
own documentation.
* Word is good for perhaps really long shopping lists and that's about
all (attributed to a Microsoft staffer several years ago)
-- Ken in Atlanta
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+poshedlyk=polysius -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+poshedlyk=polysius -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
Behalf Of Al Geist
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 10:54 PM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: User Guides in Quark Express or InDesign
Hi Tonya,
I've used FrameMaker, PageMaker, InDesign and Word for User Guides in
excess
of 200 pages. PageMaker is a dead product, but it still works. I
feel
that InDesign gives you much more individual stylistic control than
FrameMaker, but FrameMaker gives a much higher level of consistency
between
documents. I haven't much experience with Quark to give you an
opinion on
it's capabilities. As for Word, it has it's problems, but it will do
the
trick if that's all you have to work with, and for a lot of smaller
shops,
Word is it.
The main difference between FrameMaker and the other programs (minus
Word)
is that Frame is geared toward books versus booklets. PageMaker had
a book
plugin that worked, but not as efficiently as Frame. I haven't used
InDesign for books yet.
Hope that helps. Others may have different opinions, especially
those that
have used Quark.
Al
Stefan, Tonya wrote:
Has anyone had experience developing User Guides (200+pages) in Quark
Express or InDesign? My impression is that these applications are meant
to handle design and page layout oriented projects.
_
--
Al Geist
Technical Writing, Online Help, Marketing Collateral, Web Design,
Award
Winning Videos, Professional Photography
Voice/Msg: 802-658-3140
See also:
URL: [3]www.geistimages.com (fine art prints for home or office and
note
cards for all occasions)
"When the situation is absolutely hopeless, you have nothing to worry
about."
Compliments of The Monkey Wrench Gang
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
__________________________
This e-mail message and any attachment contains private
and confidential information and is intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible
for delivery of the message to such person), please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
____________________
Polysius Corp.
Atlanta, Ga. USA http://www.PolysiusUSA.com
Voice: 770-955-3660
Main Fax: 770-955-8789
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
