TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: What's a good versioning system for Office documents?
Subject:RE: What's a good versioning system for Office documents? From:"Pradeep" <ninkozi -at- gmail -dot- com> Date:Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:48:00 +0530
1. In SVN, if A and B are both working on a doc and A checks in first, B
will get a message about his file being out-of-date or something. This way B
will know that A worked on the file, which is a GOOD THING. This ensures
much better communication.
2. File locking is available, it is just not strong file locks. A can lock a
file and B wont be able to do much with it. If A goes on leave without
releasing the locks, B can "steal" them! This is also a GOOD THING.
It is now obvious, I am a shill for SVN ;)
Pradeep
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+ninkozi=gmail -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+ninkozi=gmail -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com]
> On Behalf Of Lou Quillio
> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:43 AM
> To: Andrew Warren
> Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Re: What's a good versioning system for Office documents?
>
> Andrew Warren wrote:
> > The question isn't whether file locking can replace all need for
> > communication, but whether communication can replace all need
> > for file locking. I think the answer's "no"... And actually, I
> > think your scenario presents a good argument FOR locking: In a
> > small group, it should be easy to arrange things so
> that multiple
> > writers don't need simultaneous access to the same file.
>
> Absolutely. And ideally there's a human gatekeeper who
> represents the lock, especially in such a small group with
> relatively little content to manage. I don't see a need to
> automate much of this at all. Should've said so in the first place.
>
> LQ
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every
> major Help format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise,
> and efficient content delivery. Try it today!.
>http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
>
> Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter.
> It's that easy. Watch the demo at
>http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as ninkozi -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/ninkozi%40gmail.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
>
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l