TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: What's a good versioning system for Office documents?
Subject:RE: What's a good versioning system for Office documents? From:"Pradeep" <ninkozi -at- gmail -dot- com> To:"'Edgar D' Souza'" <edgar -dot- b -dot- dsouza -at- gmail -dot- com>, "'Paul Pehrson'" <paulpehrson -at- gmail -dot- com>, "'List,Techwriter'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:28:50 +0530
You will probably have your opportunity to convinvce them of OO benefits in
2007, when the new Office comes out. Apparently the interface is highly
radical - they have removed menus completely!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+ninkozi=gmail -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+ninkozi=gmail -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com]
> On Behalf Of Edgar D' Souza
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 6:37 PM
> To: Paul Pehrson; List,Techwriter
> Subject: Re: What's a good versioning system for Office documents?
>
> Thank you, Paul, for a great idea!
>
> At the time we started on this project, Microsoft hadn't yet
> caved in to demand and announced that they would be offering
> the ODF converter plugin. However:
> 1. We're actually using Word 2000 for this project.
>
> 2. The client's team (who are actually software engineers doubling as
> TWs) have (as I was informed) substantial inertia towards
> learning new tools - for example, the GIMP for handling their
> screenshot-and-layered-callouts requirement (or even
> Photoshop, for that matter - the inertia is apparently
> against learning curves, not OSS per se). They had insisted
> that they would continue to use Word 2000, which they are
> familiar with.
>
> 3. Their software is capable of a high level of
> customization, which means UI screenshots included with these
> manuals need to be replaced with shots of the
> post-customization UI by IT staff at /their/ customers' site.
> Multiple customers for their product means that there is a
> sizeable downstream from our client who are now settled on
> Word's .doc file format.
>
> Though the client said they'd stick with 2000, they /may/ be
> willing to upgrade to Office 2003 if it offers a better SCCS
> solution. And since we've been working in 2000 all this time,
> the docs are guaranteed not to have any 2003-specific
> features - so our clients'
> downstream shouldn't have problems working with documents
> saved as .doc and passed on to them, even though our clients
> may store them in OpenXML/ODF for their source control purposes.
>
> Brilliant! This seems to be practically my solution, provided
> the client is willing to go for it.
> Many thanks, Paul!
>
> Regards,
> Ed.
>
> On 7/11/06, Paul Pehrson <paulpehrson -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> > I'm wondering if you've considered saving your files in a
> non-MS format?
> >
> > If you were to save your documents in an XML format, then you could
> > still check them in to a source control and have only the diffs
> > stored, instead of storing the binary .doc files.
> >
> > Recent versions of MS Word allow you to save documents in
> XML formats;
> > I even read recently that in the next version of MS Word, MS will
> > support the open-document format used by OpenOffice,
> StarOffice, and
> > others (through an optional, free, plug-in).
> >
> > Good luck finding a solution that works for you.
> >
> > Paul Pehrson
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every
> major Help format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise,
> and efficient content delivery. Try it today!.
>http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
>
> Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter.
> It's that easy. Watch the demo at
>http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as ninkozi -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/ninkozi%40gmail.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
>
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l