RE: What's a good versioning system for Office documents?

Subject: RE: What's a good versioning system for Office documents?
From: "Pradeep" <ninkozi -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "'Edgar D' Souza'" <edgar -dot- b -dot- dsouza -at- gmail -dot- com>, "'Paul Pehrson'" <paulpehrson -at- gmail -dot- com>, "'List,Techwriter'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:28:50 +0530

You will probably have your opportunity to convinvce them of OO benefits in
2007, when the new Office comes out. Apparently the interface is highly
radical - they have removed menus completely!


> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+ninkozi=gmail -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+ninkozi=gmail -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com]
> On Behalf Of Edgar D' Souza
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 6:37 PM
> To: Paul Pehrson; List,Techwriter
> Subject: Re: What's a good versioning system for Office documents?
>
> Thank you, Paul, for a great idea!
>
> At the time we started on this project, Microsoft hadn't yet
> caved in to demand and announced that they would be offering
> the ODF converter plugin. However:
> 1. We're actually using Word 2000 for this project.
>
> 2. The client's team (who are actually software engineers doubling as
> TWs) have (as I was informed) substantial inertia towards
> learning new tools - for example, the GIMP for handling their
> screenshot-and-layered-callouts requirement (or even
> Photoshop, for that matter - the inertia is apparently
> against learning curves, not OSS per se). They had insisted
> that they would continue to use Word 2000, which they are
> familiar with.
>
> 3. Their software is capable of a high level of
> customization, which means UI screenshots included with these
> manuals need to be replaced with shots of the
> post-customization UI by IT staff at /their/ customers' site.
> Multiple customers for their product means that there is a
> sizeable downstream from our client who are now settled on
> Word's .doc file format.
>
> Though the client said they'd stick with 2000, they /may/ be
> willing to upgrade to Office 2003 if it offers a better SCCS
> solution. And since we've been working in 2000 all this time,
> the docs are guaranteed not to have any 2003-specific
> features - so our clients'
> downstream shouldn't have problems working with documents
> saved as .doc and passed on to them, even though our clients
> may store them in OpenXML/ODF for their source control purposes.
>
> Brilliant! This seems to be practically my solution, provided
> the client is willing to go for it.
> Many thanks, Paul!
>
> Regards,
> Ed.
>
> On 7/11/06, Paul Pehrson <paulpehrson -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> > I'm wondering if you've considered saving your files in a
> non-MS format?
> >
> > If you were to save your documents in an XML format, then you could
> > still check them in to a source control and have only the diffs
> > stored, instead of storing the binary .doc files.
> >
> > Recent versions of MS Word allow you to save documents in
> XML formats;
> > I even read recently that in the next version of MS Word, MS will
> > support the open-document format used by OpenOffice,
> StarOffice, and
> > others (through an optional, free, plug-in).
> >
> > Good luck finding a solution that works for you.
> >
> > Paul Pehrson
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every
> major Help format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise,
> and efficient content delivery. Try it today!.
> http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
>
> Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter.
> It's that easy. Watch the demo at
> http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as ninkozi -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
> http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/ninkozi%40gmail.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
Re: What's a good versioning system for Office documents?: From: Edgar D' Souza

Previous by Author: RE: What's a good versioning system for Office documents?
Next by Author: RE: What's a good versioning system for Office documents?
Previous by Thread: Re: What's a good versioning system for Office documents?
Next by Thread: Re: What's a good versioning system for Office documents?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads